The Meals and Drug Administration on Thursday ordered Juul to cease promoting e-cigarettes on the U.S. market, a profoundly damaging blow to a once-popular firm whose model was blamed for the teenage vaping disaster.

The order impacts all of Juul’s merchandise on the U.S. market, the overwhelming supply of the corporate’s gross sales. Juul’s smooth vaping cartridges and sweet-flavored pods helped usher in an period of other nicotine merchandise that have been exceptionally enticing to younger individuals. The corporate’s preliminary dominance invited intense scrutiny from antismoking teams and regulators who feared the merchandise would do extra hurt to younger individuals than good to cigarette people who smoke making an attempt to stop.

Though teenage vaping charges have declined through the coronavirus pandemic, public well being consultants and lawmakers proceed to specific issues concerning the additive nicotine in some e-cigarettes that stay available on the market, together with manufacturers like Puff Bar, whose fruity flavors attraction to younger individuals.

The F.D.A.’s determination didn’t cope with Juul’s relationship to youth vaping. As an alternative it was primarily based on what the company mentioned was inadequate and conflicting knowledge from the corporate about probably dangerous chemical compounds that might leach out of Juul’s e-liquid pods. There was not an imminent well being menace to customers, the F.D.A. mentioned, but it surely didn’t have sufficient proof to evaluate the potential dangers.

“At present’s motion is additional progress on the F.D.A.’s dedication to making sure that every one e-cigarette and digital nicotine supply system merchandise at the moment being marketed to customers meet our public well being requirements,” Dr. Robert M. Califf, the company commissioner, mentioned in a press release. And he acknowledged that most of the e-cigarette merchandise had performed a task within the rise in teenage vaping.

The transfer by the F.D.A. is a part of a wide-ranging effort to remake the principles for smoking and vaping merchandise and to scale back diseases and deaths brought on by inhalable merchandise containing extremely addictive nicotine.

On Tuesday, the company introduced plans to slash nicotine ranges in conventional cigarettes as a method to discourage use of essentially the most lethal of authorized client merchandise. In April, the F.D.A. mentioned it might transfer towards a ban on menthol-flavored cigarettes.

The F.D.A.’s motion towards Juul particularly is a part of a more recent regulatory mission for the company, which should decide which digital cigarettes at the moment on the market, or proposed on the market, will probably be allowed to completely stay on cabinets. It has already granted permission for different corporations’ e-cigarettes to remain available on the market.

Nevertheless it may take years earlier than a few of the company’s new initiatives take impact — if they’ll face up to fierce resistance from the highly effective tobacco foyer, antiregulatory teams and the vaping trade.

Juul mentioned it disagreed with the F.D.A.’s findings and deliberate to attraction. The corporate may search a keep from the company or from a court docket pending an attraction to the F.D.A. The corporate has not mentioned which path it would search however it would attempt to maintain its merchandise available on the market throughout any proceedings.

“We intend to hunt a keep,” Juul’s assertion concluded, “and are exploring all of our choices below the F.D.A.’s laws and the legislation, together with interesting the choice and interesting with our regulator.”

Public well being teams hailed the ruling.

“The F.D.A.’s determination to take away all Juul merchandise from {the marketplace} is each most welcomed and lengthy overdue,” mentioned Erika Sward, nationwide assistant vice chairman of advocacy for the American Lung Affiliation. “Juul’s marketing campaign to focus on and hook children on tobacco has gone on for much too lengthy.”

A press release from the American Vapor Producers Affiliation, an trade commerce group, hinted on the struggle forward.

“Measured in lives misplaced and potential destroyed, F.D.A.’s staggering indifference to abnormal People and their proper to change to the vastly safer various of vaping will certainly rank as one of many best episodes of regulatory malpractice in American historical past,” Amanda Wheeler, the affiliation’s president, mentioned in a press release.

Broadly, the F.D.A. is strolling a positive line in remaking the panorama for nicotine merchandise. It’s making an attempt to wean the general public off conventional cigarettes whereas allowing much less dangerous vaping merchandise that don’t entice a brand new era of customers: The brand new gadgets have to be interesting for smoking cessation however not so interesting that they lure younger individuals en masse.

The company’s ruling towards Juul capped an almost two-year assessment of information that the corporate had submitted to attempt to win authorization to proceed promoting its tobacco and menthol-flavored merchandise in america. Particularly, Juul sought approval for — and the F.D.A. rejected — a Juul vaping machine and 4 completely different pods, together with tobacco pods with nicotine concentrations of three % and 5 % and menthol-flavored pods with the identical ranges.

“It’s clear that the corporate was given a chance to deal with questions and issues associated to security, toxicology and potential genotoxicity, and for no matter cause the corporate was unable to satisfy its burden and that led to a damaging advertising and marketing order,” mentioned Mitch Zeller, a former director of the company’s tobacco heart who retired in April.

He mentioned Juul may submit a wholly new utility for a revamped product — one which presumably addressed the company’s issues concerning the leaching of chemical compounds.

The F.D.A. started an investigation into Juul’s advertising and marketing efforts 4 years in the past. Earlier than that point, Juul had marketed its product utilizing enticing younger fashions and flavors like cool cucumber and creme brulee that critics mentioned attracted underage customers.

In April 2018, the F.D.A. introduced a crackdown on the sale of such merchandise, together with Juul’s, to individuals below the age of 21.

Use amongst younger individuals had soared. In 2017, 19 % of twelfth graders, 16 % of tenth graders and eight % of eighth graders reported vaping nicotine within the earlier yr, in accordance with Monitoring the Future, an annual survey accomplished for the Nationwide Institute on Drug Abuse.

For its half, Juul routinely denied that it focused younger individuals, but it surely was pursued in lawsuits and by state attorneys normal, with some circumstances leading to hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in damages towards the corporate. In one settlement in 2021, Juul agreed to pay $40 million to North Carolina, which represented varied events within the state who asserted the corporate had helped lure underage customers to vaping. Greater than a dozen different states have lawsuits and investigations which are nonetheless pending.

The information is considerably much less weighty for the trade now than it might have been in Juul’s heyday, given the corporate’s plummeting market share. As soon as the dominant participant with 75 % of the market, Juul now has a significantly smaller share of the market.

However the information delivers a major blow to Altria, previously generally known as Philip Morris and the maker of Marlboro, which in December 2018 purchased 35 % of Juul for $12.8 billion.

Altria made the funding to counteract slowing tobacco gross sales, whereas Juul regarded to Altria as an ally to assist it navigate elevated regulatory scrutiny.

Neither of these methods seem to have labored out.

Altria has written down the worth of its funding in Juul by greater than $11 billion, to $1.7 billion. Altria, which will get about 90 % of its income from smokable merchandise, noticed income fall barely final yr. Its inventory is down greater than 40 % over the previous 5 years, and 20 % simply up to now month. Juul, for its half, noticed its income fall to $1.3 billion in 2021, from $2 billion in 2019, with about 95 % in U.S. gross sales.

“We’re upset with at this time’s determination and proceed to consider that e-vapor can play an essential function in hurt discount for grownup people who smoke,” Altria mentioned in a press release.

At its peak, Juul had greater than 4,000 staff. It now has barely over 1,000, largely in america, however with some in Canada, Britain and different nations.

E-cigarettes have been bought on the U.S. marketplace for greater than a decade with out formal F.D.A. authorization, as a result of they didn’t fall below the company’s regulatory purview for a number of years.

In 2019, the F.D.A. issued a warning letter to Juul, saying that the corporate violated federal laws as a result of it had not obtained approval to advertise and promote its merchandise as a more healthy choice to smoking.

The F.D.A. lately mentioned it had thus far rejected greater than 1,000,000 functions for merchandise it thought-about extra of a well being danger than a profit. In October, it licensed R.J. Reynolds to proceed advertising and marketing Vuse. This was the primary time the company granted approval to a vaping product made by a giant cigarette firm

In March, the company licensed a number of tobacco-flavored merchandise from Logic Know-how Improvement, saying the corporate was in a position to present that its merchandise have been doubtless to assist adults make the transition from conventional cigarettes whereas posing a low danger of attracting younger, new customers.

Some tobacco management consultants mentioned the choice to ban Juul from the U.S. market may very well be counterproductive.

Clifford Douglas, director of the College of Michigan Tobacco Analysis Community, mentioned that many consultants had come to see Juul and different e-cigarettes as helpful instruments for serving to grownup people who smoke stop standard cigarettes.

“They’re off ramps that may present people who smoke a substitute for combustibles, that are answerable for nearly each demise associated to tobacco,” he mentioned. “However now that off ramp is being narrowed and type of paved over, which is placing hundreds of thousands of grownup lives at stake. One hopes Juul can reply successfully to the request for extra scientific evaluation, make any product changes which may be referred to as for, and once more supply their merchandise to adults in want.”

Lauren Hirsch, Christina Jewett and Sheila Kaplan contributed reporting.

The Meals and Drug Administration on Thursday ordered Juul to cease promoting e-cigarettes on the U.S. market, a profoundly damaging blow to a once-popular firm whose model was blamed for the teenage vaping disaster.

The order impacts all of Juul’s merchandise on the U.S. market, the overwhelming supply of the corporate’s gross sales. Juul’s smooth vaping cartridges and sweet-flavored pods helped usher in an period of other nicotine merchandise that have been exceptionally enticing to younger individuals. The corporate’s preliminary dominance invited intense scrutiny from antismoking teams and regulators who feared the merchandise would do extra hurt to younger individuals than good to cigarette people who smoke making an attempt to stop.

Though teenage vaping charges have declined through the coronavirus pandemic, public well being consultants and lawmakers proceed to specific issues concerning the additive nicotine in some e-cigarettes that stay available on the market, together with manufacturers like Puff Bar, whose fruity flavors attraction to younger individuals.

The F.D.A.’s determination didn’t cope with Juul’s relationship to youth vaping. As an alternative it was primarily based on what the company mentioned was inadequate and conflicting knowledge from the corporate about probably dangerous chemical compounds that might leach out of Juul’s e-liquid pods. There was not an imminent well being menace to customers, the F.D.A. mentioned, but it surely didn’t have sufficient proof to evaluate the potential dangers.

“At present’s motion is additional progress on the F.D.A.’s dedication to making sure that every one e-cigarette and digital nicotine supply system merchandise at the moment being marketed to customers meet our public well being requirements,” Dr. Robert M. Califf, the company commissioner, mentioned in a press release. And he acknowledged that most of the e-cigarette merchandise had performed a task within the rise in teenage vaping.

The transfer by the F.D.A. is a part of a wide-ranging effort to remake the principles for smoking and vaping merchandise and to scale back diseases and deaths brought on by inhalable merchandise containing extremely addictive nicotine.

On Tuesday, the company introduced plans to slash nicotine ranges in conventional cigarettes as a method to discourage use of essentially the most lethal of authorized client merchandise. In April, the F.D.A. mentioned it might transfer towards a ban on menthol-flavored cigarettes.

The F.D.A.’s motion towards Juul particularly is a part of a more recent regulatory mission for the company, which should decide which digital cigarettes at the moment on the market, or proposed on the market, will probably be allowed to completely stay on cabinets. It has already granted permission for different corporations’ e-cigarettes to remain available on the market.

Nevertheless it may take years earlier than a few of the company’s new initiatives take impact — if they’ll face up to fierce resistance from the highly effective tobacco foyer, antiregulatory teams and the vaping trade.

Juul mentioned it disagreed with the F.D.A.’s findings and deliberate to attraction. The corporate may search a keep from the company or from a court docket pending an attraction to the F.D.A. The corporate has not mentioned which path it would search however it would attempt to maintain its merchandise available on the market throughout any proceedings.

“We intend to hunt a keep,” Juul’s assertion concluded, “and are exploring all of our choices below the F.D.A.’s laws and the legislation, together with interesting the choice and interesting with our regulator.”

Public well being teams hailed the ruling.

“The F.D.A.’s determination to take away all Juul merchandise from {the marketplace} is each most welcomed and lengthy overdue,” mentioned Erika Sward, nationwide assistant vice chairman of advocacy for the American Lung Affiliation. “Juul’s marketing campaign to focus on and hook children on tobacco has gone on for much too lengthy.”

A press release from the American Vapor Producers Affiliation, an trade commerce group, hinted on the struggle forward.

“Measured in lives misplaced and potential destroyed, F.D.A.’s staggering indifference to abnormal People and their proper to change to the vastly safer various of vaping will certainly rank as one of many best episodes of regulatory malpractice in American historical past,” Amanda Wheeler, the affiliation’s president, mentioned in a press release.

Broadly, the F.D.A. is strolling a positive line in remaking the panorama for nicotine merchandise. It’s making an attempt to wean the general public off conventional cigarettes whereas allowing much less dangerous vaping merchandise that don’t entice a brand new era of customers: The brand new gadgets have to be interesting for smoking cessation however not so interesting that they lure younger individuals en masse.

The company’s ruling towards Juul capped an almost two-year assessment of information that the corporate had submitted to attempt to win authorization to proceed promoting its tobacco and menthol-flavored merchandise in america. Particularly, Juul sought approval for — and the F.D.A. rejected — a Juul vaping machine and 4 completely different pods, together with tobacco pods with nicotine concentrations of three % and 5 % and menthol-flavored pods with the identical ranges.

“It’s clear that the corporate was given a chance to deal with questions and issues associated to security, toxicology and potential genotoxicity, and for no matter cause the corporate was unable to satisfy its burden and that led to a damaging advertising and marketing order,” mentioned Mitch Zeller, a former director of the company’s tobacco heart who retired in April.

He mentioned Juul may submit a wholly new utility for a revamped product — one which presumably addressed the company’s issues concerning the leaching of chemical compounds.

The F.D.A. started an investigation into Juul’s advertising and marketing efforts 4 years in the past. Earlier than that point, Juul had marketed its product utilizing enticing younger fashions and flavors like cool cucumber and creme brulee that critics mentioned attracted underage customers.

In April 2018, the F.D.A. introduced a crackdown on the sale of such merchandise, together with Juul’s, to individuals below the age of 21.

Use amongst younger individuals had soared. In 2017, 19 % of twelfth graders, 16 % of tenth graders and eight % of eighth graders reported vaping nicotine within the earlier yr, in accordance with Monitoring the Future, an annual survey accomplished for the Nationwide Institute on Drug Abuse.

For its half, Juul routinely denied that it focused younger individuals, but it surely was pursued in lawsuits and by state attorneys normal, with some circumstances leading to hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in damages towards the corporate. In one settlement in 2021, Juul agreed to pay $40 million to North Carolina, which represented varied events within the state who asserted the corporate had helped lure underage customers to vaping. Greater than a dozen different states have lawsuits and investigations which are nonetheless pending.

The information is considerably much less weighty for the trade now than it might have been in Juul’s heyday, given the corporate’s plummeting market share. As soon as the dominant participant with 75 % of the market, Juul now has a significantly smaller share of the market.

However the information delivers a major blow to Altria, previously generally known as Philip Morris and the maker of Marlboro, which in December 2018 purchased 35 % of Juul for $12.8 billion.

Altria made the funding to counteract slowing tobacco gross sales, whereas Juul regarded to Altria as an ally to assist it navigate elevated regulatory scrutiny.

Neither of these methods seem to have labored out.

Altria has written down the worth of its funding in Juul by greater than $11 billion, to $1.7 billion. Altria, which will get about 90 % of its income from smokable merchandise, noticed income fall barely final yr. Its inventory is down greater than 40 % over the previous 5 years, and 20 % simply up to now month. Juul, for its half, noticed its income fall to $1.3 billion in 2021, from $2 billion in 2019, with about 95 % in U.S. gross sales.

“We’re upset with at this time’s determination and proceed to consider that e-vapor can play an essential function in hurt discount for grownup people who smoke,” Altria mentioned in a press release.

At its peak, Juul had greater than 4,000 staff. It now has barely over 1,000, largely in america, however with some in Canada, Britain and different nations.

E-cigarettes have been bought on the U.S. marketplace for greater than a decade with out formal F.D.A. authorization, as a result of they didn’t fall below the company’s regulatory purview for a number of years.

In 2019, the F.D.A. issued a warning letter to Juul, saying that the corporate violated federal laws as a result of it had not obtained approval to advertise and promote its merchandise as a more healthy choice to smoking.

The F.D.A. lately mentioned it had thus far rejected greater than 1,000,000 functions for merchandise it thought-about extra of a well being danger than a profit. In October, it licensed R.J. Reynolds to proceed advertising and marketing Vuse. This was the primary time the company granted approval to a vaping product made by a giant cigarette firm

In March, the company licensed a number of tobacco-flavored merchandise from Logic Know-how Improvement, saying the corporate was in a position to present that its merchandise have been doubtless to assist adults make the transition from conventional cigarettes whereas posing a low danger of attracting younger, new customers.

Some tobacco management consultants mentioned the choice to ban Juul from the U.S. market may very well be counterproductive.

Clifford Douglas, director of the College of Michigan Tobacco Analysis Community, mentioned that many consultants had come to see Juul and different e-cigarettes as helpful instruments for serving to grownup people who smoke stop standard cigarettes.

“They’re off ramps that may present people who smoke a substitute for combustibles, that are answerable for nearly each demise associated to tobacco,” he mentioned. “However now that off ramp is being narrowed and type of paved over, which is placing hundreds of thousands of grownup lives at stake. One hopes Juul can reply successfully to the request for extra scientific evaluation, make any product changes which may be referred to as for, and once more supply their merchandise to adults in want.”

Lauren Hirsch, Christina Jewett and Sheila Kaplan contributed reporting.